Comparison Between 7010 Aluminum and 7050 Aluminum
7010 aluminum has better tensile strength and shear strength, making it more suitable for high-stress applications, while 7050 aluminum offers excellent fatigue strength and resistance to stress corrosion cracking, making it an ideal choice for critical aerospace structures. Both alloys are excellent choices, but the decision between them ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the application.
Both 7010 aluminum and 7050 aluminum are high-strength, heat-treatable aluminum alloys with very similar alloy compositions, primarily used in aerospace and other high-performance fields. They both belong to the 7xxx series of aluminum alloys, with zinc as the primary alloying element. Although similar, they differ slightly in performance, and depending on the specific requirements of the application, one may be more suitable than the other.
7010 Aluminum vs. 7050 Aluminum
Properties | 7010 Aluminum Alloy | 7050 Aluminum Alloy |
Major Chemical Composition | Contains zinc, copper, magnesium, chromium, and zirconium; slightly higher zinc content, higher strength | Contains zinc, copper, magnesium, chromium, and zirconium; optimized ratio improves corrosion resistance and ductility |
Tensile Strength | Slightly higher, suitable for high-load applications | Slightly lower, still meets most high-strength requirements |
Yield Strength | Higher, maintains shape better in high-stress environments | Slightly lower, but still exhibits excellent yield strength |
Elongation at Break | Lower, less formability and ductility | Better ductility, suitable for complex forming processes |
Fatigue Strength | Superior fatigue resistance, suitable for consistent cyclic stress applications | Performs better in fluctuating load environments |
Shear Strength | Slightly higher, suitable for applications under shear load | Slightly lower, but still performs well |
Thermal and Electrical Properties | Slightly higher thermal and electrical conductivity, suitable for heat dissipation and current transmission applications | Similar to 7010, performance differences are not significant |
Density | Slightly lower, suitable for weight-reduction designs | Slightly higher, slightly heavier |
Price | Similar to 7050, offers high cost-performance ratio | Similar to 7010, suitable for high-performance requirements |
Other Characteristics | Higher strength and fatigue resistance, suitable for critical structural components | Better ductility, suitable for applications requiring versatility and formability |
Application Selection Recommendations:
7010 Aluminum: Suitable for critical structural components that require higher strength, fatigue performance, and shear strength, such as aerospace frames, landing gear components, and high-stress assemblies.
7050 Aluminum: Suitable for components requiring higher ductility and formability, such as complex-shaped aerospace structures and components subjected to multiple load environments.
7010 Aluminum and 7050 Aluminum Applications
7010 aluminum and 7050 aluminum are primarily used in aerospace applications due to their high strength, stress corrosion resistance, and excellent fatigue resistance.
- 7010 Aluminum: Due to its slightly higher strength, it is often used in military aircraft, fuselage structures, and components requiring high tensile strength and shear strength, particularly in areas where fatigue resistance is critical.
- 7050 Aluminum: Known for its excellent resistance to stress corrosion cracking, 7050 is frequently used in aircraft wings, fuselage frames, and other aerospace structures where stress corrosion cracking may be a concern. It is particularly used in components requiring high ductility and fatigue resistance.
7010 Aluminum vs. 7050 Aluminum Alloy Composition
7010 and 7050 aluminum alloys share a similar composition, with zinc as the primary alloying element that provides strength. Both include copper, magnesium, chromium, and zirconium, which fine-tune their mechanical properties. However, subtle differences in their proportions affect their performance, such as strength and resistance to stress corrosion cracking.
Element | 7010 Aluminum (%) | 7050 Aluminum (%) |
Aluminum (Al) | 87.9 - 90.6 | 87.3 - 92.1 |
Chromium (Cr) | 0 - 0.050 | 0 - 0.040 |
Copper (Cu) | 1.5 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 2.6 |
Iron (Fe) | 0 - 0.15 | 0 - 0.15 |
Magnesium (Mg) | 2.1 - 2.6 | 1.9 - 2.6 |
Manganese (Mn) | 0 - 0.1 | 0 - 0.1 |
Nickel (Ni) | 0 - 0.050 | 0 |
Silicon (Si) | 0 - 0.12 | 0 - 0.12 |
Titanium (Ti) | 0 - 0.060 | 0 - 0.060 |
Zinc (Zn) | 5.7 - 6.7 | 5.7 - 6.7 |
Zirconium (Zr) | 0.1 - 0.16 | 0.080 - 0.15 |
Residuals | 0 | 0 - 0.15 |
7010 Aluminum vs. 7050 Aluminum Mechanical Properties
Tensile Strength
7010 aluminum typically achieves slightly higher ultimate tensile strength compared to 7050, making it more suited for applications requiring maximum load resistance. This strength difference is advantageous in components designed for high-stress environments.
Yield Strength
Both alloys exhibit excellent yield strength, essential for structural applications, with 7010 generally offering a marginally higher value. This small advantage can be critical in designs where the material must maintain its shape under substantial stress.
Elongation at Break
7050 aluminum demonstrates superior ductility, providing better elongation before fracture. This makes it a better choice for applications needing higher formability, such as parts subjected to complex forming processes.
Fatigue Strength
While 7010 aluminum often shows better fatigue resistance under consistent cyclic stress, 7050 can perform exceptionally well under varying or fluctuating loads. This flexibility gives 7050 an edge in dynamic environments.
Shear Strength
7010 aluminum typically provides slightly higher resistance to shearing forces, making it more effective in applications involving shear loads, such as fasteners or structural joints.
Property | 7010 Aluminum | 7050 Aluminum |
Elastic Modulus (GPa) | 70 | 70 |
Elongation at Break (%) | 3.9 - 6.8 | 2.2 - 12 |
Fatigue Strength (MPa) | 160 - 190 | 130 - 210 |
Poisson's Ratio | 0.32 | 0.32 |
Shear Modulus (GPa) | 26 | 26 |
Shear Strength (MPa) | 300 - 340 | 280 - 330 |
Tensile Strength: Ultimate (MPa) | 520 - 590 | 490 - 570 |
Tensile Strength: Yield (MPa) | 410 - 540 | 390 - 500 |
7010 Aluminum vs. 7050 Aluminum Thermal Properties
Property | 7010 Aluminum | 7050 Aluminum |
Latent Heat of Fusion (J/g) | 380 | 370 |
Maximum Operating Temperature (°C) | 200 | 190 |
Melting Completion (°C) | 630 | 630 |
Melting Onset (°C) | 480 | 490 |
Specific Heat Capacity (J/kg-K) | 860 | 860 |
Thermal Conductivity (W/m-K) | 150 | 140 |
Thermal Expansion (µm/m-K) | 24 | 24 |
7010 Aluminum vs. 7050 Aluminum Electrical Properties
Property | 7010 Aluminum | 7050 Aluminum |
Electrical Conductivity: Volume Equivalent (% IACS) | 40 | 35 |
Electrical Conductivity: Weight Equivalent (% IACS) | 120 | 100 |
Other Properties
Property | 7010 Aluminum | 7050 Aluminum |
Base Metal Price (% relative) | 10 | 10 |
Density (g/cm³) | 3.0 | 3.1 |
Embodied Carbon (kg CO₂/kg) | 8.3 | 8.2 |
Embodied Energy (MJ/kg) | 150 | 150 |
Embodied Water (L/kg) | 1120 | 1120 |
Common Calculations
Property | 7010 Aluminum | 7050 Aluminum |
Resilience: Ultimate (MJ/m³) | 22 - 33 | 10 - 55 |
Resilience: Unit (kJ/m³) | 1230 - 2130 | 1110 - 1760 |
Stiffness-to-Weight: Axial | 13 | 13 |
Stiffness-to-Weight: Bending | 45 | 45 |
Strength-to-Weight: Axial | 47 - 54 | 45 - 51 |
Strength-to-Weight: Bending | 47 - 52 | 45 - 50 |
Thermal Diffusivity (mm²/s) | 58 | 54 |
Thermal Shock Resistance | 22 - 26 | 21 - 25 |